Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: In the spirit of Locost
dave1888

posted on 11/3/06 at 01:24 PM Reply With Quote
In the spirit of Locost

I found this on the net. Can't cost that much to make.
http://martybugs.net/electronics/speedo.cgi

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisg

posted on 12/3/06 at 11:13 AM Reply With Quote
looks good but I was out of my depth in the second paragraph.

I'm not good with electrickery

Cheers

Chris

[Edited on 12/3/06 by chrisg]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeRJ

posted on 12/3/06 at 09:58 PM Reply With Quote
It won't cost much, but it would be much simpler and very likely cheaper to use a micro such as a PIC instead of the discrete logic. It will also be far more stable, that design has it's clock derived from a 555 timer IC which will not be particularly stable over time or with temperature changes.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
chrisg

posted on 13/3/06 at 09:33 PM Reply With Quote
Yes, that's what I thought.

You definately need a wibble capacitor to enbongalate the resitivator.....

Cheers

Chris

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeR

posted on 13/3/06 at 10:29 PM Reply With Quote
i thought that if i removed the 555 timer and the wibble capacitor both could be replaced by some uranium housed in a flux capacitor. This would give a much more stable time signal - although would be subject to some other minor environmental issues.
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Peteff

posted on 14/3/06 at 12:20 AM Reply With Quote
Weapons grade plutonium would be better I think with a strontium core condenser, flux capacitors are so 90's.





yours, Pete

I went into the RSPCA office the other day. It was so small you could hardly swing a cat in there.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeR

posted on 15/3/06 at 12:09 AM Reply With Quote
yeah but i like retro - thats why i'm building a replica 50's sportscar!


View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Patching Cars

posted on 19/3/06 at 10:28 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by MikeR
i thought that if i removed the 555 timer and the wibble capacitor both could be replaced by some uranium housed in a flux capacitor. This would give a much more stable time signal - although would be subject to some other minor environmental issues.


But wouldn't that limit you to a top speed of 88 mile per hour without unwanted side effects?

I quite like the idea, and have added it my collection of useless circuit designs along with my digital boost gauge.





Rob

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.