Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: what is anti tramp and axle tramp?
blakep82

posted on 22/4/07 at 08:33 PM Reply With Quote
what is anti tramp and axle tramp?

or indeed axle tramp...

is this the same as anti squat?

been buying some axle brackets from rally design and they call the anti tramp brackets

[Edited on 22/4/07 by blakep82]





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
amalyos

posted on 22/4/07 at 08:43 PM Reply With Quote
Tramping is normally caused by the windup of the rear axle under acceleration. The tramp bars stop the axle winding on the springs.
A typical set up on an escort would be 4 link bars that stop the tramp, and a panhard rod that locates the axle sideways.

Steve







http://stevembuild.blogspot.com

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 22/4/07 at 08:46 PM Reply With Quote
do you mean like the prop shaft trying to twist the axle (lifting one of the wheels and pushing the other down)?

how do the link bars stop it?





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
amalyos

posted on 22/4/07 at 08:55 PM Reply With Quote
No, normally a live axle is mounted on leaf springs only, so when you accelerate the wheels push the axle forward, but as they are only connected to the springs, they start to twist the springs. The wind up of the spring is what causes the tramp effect.
By locating the axle with bars you transfer the thrust straight to the body.







http://stevembuild.blogspot.com

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 22/4/07 at 09:36 PM Reply With Quote
i see!

so, since we're all using 4 link systems we shouldn't be too concerned then should we?





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 22/4/07 at 09:41 PM Reply With Quote
With the 4 link set up, tramp disappears. With a 5 link set up, axle movement should be totally controlable, but you'll need a Watt's link or similar to do it properly. BUt you sound as if you know that anyways





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 22/4/07 at 09:56 PM Reply With Quote
i'll be working on my watts linkage very soon





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 22/4/07 at 10:01 PM Reply With Quote
I take it then that you now know the difference between anti tramp and anti squat? I'm guessing you knew the two set ups, but were unsure as to the names?





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
blakep82

posted on 22/4/07 at 10:11 PM Reply With Quote
anti squat being a set up that prevents the back of the car pushing down on acceleration? (similar to anti dive on the front, to stop the front of the car dropping under braking?)

I'm not too good on suspension geometry, but really need to get the basics sorted in my head before building a car which will be horrible to drive





________________________

IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083

don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 22/4/07 at 10:19 PM Reply With Quote
Yup, you got it right. Anti-tramp to stop the axle bouncing all over the place, and anti-squat to aid traction off the line.





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 23/4/07 at 09:11 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by DIY Si
Yup, you got it right. Anti-tramp to stop the axle bouncing all over the place, and anti-squat to aid traction off the line.


Actually in my view the more squat you have the better traction and acceleration you have off the line because whieght is tranfered onto the rear driven wheels - but it's really bad news accelerating out of a corner as it unloads the front wheels and causes control problems - so if you're building a straight line dragster go for squat but if you're building a track racer limit squat.

Like all things in car's suspension setting "squat" is a compromise.






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 23/4/07 at 01:57 PM Reply With Quote
My understandinsg is simialr, but varies in one detail. The anti-squat tries to force the car up at the back, thus putting the weight plus the reaction force through the wheels, thus increasing grip. Lots of anti-squat will see the back of the car rise on launch. I may however have the wrong term for it, but I know it as anti-squat.
As you rightly say though, it will remove all/most of the front wheel grip, so flooring it mid corner wil see you understeer into a tree.





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 23/4/07 at 03:12 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by DIY Si
The anti-squat tries to force the car up at the back, thus putting the weight plus the reaction force through the wheels, thus increasing grip.

That's interesting thanks - I have learn't something but will check it out in the literature as you don't seem sure - guess that's what this site is all about






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
DIY Si

posted on 23/4/07 at 03:31 PM Reply With Quote
I'm sure about how it works, just unsure on the correct term. As you apply the power the axle will try to twist. This twist normally squats the car down by pushing the top trailing arm forward and pulling the bottom one backwards. However, if you angle the trailing arms up, this then decreases the effect of the twist and thus squat, eventually reaching 100% anti-squat as the car sits level at a full launch. 100%+ will see the car rise. That's probably badly explained and makes not much sense, but it should get some of what I mean across.





“Let your plans be dark and as impenetratable as night, and when you move, fall like a thunderbolt.”
Sun Tzu, The Art of War

My new blog: http://spritecave.blogspot.co.uk/

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
locost_bryan

posted on 24/4/07 at 04:04 AM Reply With Quote
A 4 or 5 link rear can still allow axle tramp if it's not well designed, or the bushings allow too much movement - the Triumph TR7 was an example.

The old Chevette with it's torque-tube 3 link rear had so much anti-squat, it would visibly rise up at the rear (even with a modest 57hp!) Almost impossible to get wheel spin, but still very neutral handling.





Bryan Miller
Auckland NZ

Bruce McLaren - "Where's my F1 car?"
John Cooper - "In that rack of tubes, son"

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Ivan

posted on 24/4/07 at 06:12 AM Reply With Quote
Thanks for the clarification I am planning to re-design the suspension on my Cobra which currently has tons of squat off the line giving me quarter mile times of around 13.5 seconds which is much better than my motor deserves due to almost zero wheelspin off the line.

The car also handles a bit like a barge due mainly (I think) to rediculously heavy unsprung weight and very soft springs giving a wheel rate of around 75.

I will seriously concider building in a little anti-dive (another problem I have) and anti-squat.

All the above to go with twin turbos and homemade EFI to give around 650 hp (We can dream can't we)

Now if only I could find a cheap sequential box to go with it - will have to stick with TH400 for the meantime

[Edited on 24/4/07 by Ivan]






View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
procomp

posted on 24/4/07 at 07:08 AM Reply With Quote
Hi some rather rash comments regarding the use of anti-squat above.

If interested in anti-squat then try some research on mallock clubman cars.

It is somthing that if you have a live axle is certinaly worth looking at if looking for better acceleration.

cheers matt

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.