thunderace
|
 posted on 29/10/07 at 01:18 PM |
|
|
royal blackmail attempt
who know who it is ?
|
|
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:19 PM |
|
|
i'm taking a guess at prince andrew, or harry
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
David Jenkins
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:20 PM |
|
|
The palace spokesman did say "not a senior royal", allegedly.
|
|
|
graememk
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:20 PM |
|
|
maybe someone has photos of them dressed as hitler ?
|
|
|
speedyxjs
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:24 PM |
|
|
I think it was the Queen 
Not really, havent a clue
How long can i resist the temptation to drop a V8 in?
|
|
|
nick205
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:44 PM |
|
|
My question is do I really care who it was or what they were "allegedly" up to?
My answer is no 
|
|
|
mookaloid
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 01:56 PM |
|
|
I don't want to know.
If some one has been a victim of blackmail, (Royal or not) then if their name is released the blackmailer wins - or more to the point the victim
loses.
"That thing you're thinking - it wont be that."
|
|
|
wilkingj
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 02:01 PM |
|
|
It all depends on whether its true or not. ie what they have allegedly done is really what happend or not.
You WONT find out the truth, as it will be covered up or diluted etc etc.
Same with Diana, Its 10 years on, and they have only juts got round to an inquest.
Its like the report on the Dunblane killings, the Internal police report is said to have a 100 year disclosure ban on it. Whats in it that we must not
see, or know?
Anything the authorities DONT want you to hear, then will make it very very difficult to get at the truth.
Remember.... The TRUTH is out there!...
(Hums).... Doo dee dlddly dooo
Ah... the little green men are coming to take me away!
1. The point of a journey is not to arrive.
2. Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Best Regards
Geoff
http://www.v8viento.co.uk
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 02:05 PM |
|
|
^ is there not supposed to be some disclsure ban on something prince phillip is suppose dto have done years ago (i forget how many, 40 or something)
which is coming to an end soon?
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
wilkingj
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 02:07 PM |
|
|
Thought:
What if its true... Like one of the younsters, had a spliff, then shagged some lass (or even a bloke).
Why is it such headline news? It happens most nights in most major Cities in the UK.
Poor royals cant have a real life like the rest of us. They can't even fart without someone reporting it to the press.
No exciting sex in the park, a field or the back of a car for them. They miss out on a lot really!
Glad I'm not one. (a royal that is!)
1. The point of a journey is not to arrive.
2. Never take life seriously. Nobody gets out alive anyway.
Best Regards
Geoff
http://www.v8viento.co.uk
|
|
|
Volvorsport
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 02:32 PM |
|
|
i think id have a go on kate tho !!
www.dbsmotorsport.co.uk
getting dirty under a bus
|
|
|
blakep82
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 02:34 PM |
|
|
kate who? kate middleton?
hell yeah, she's hot, i'd have a go on her too
[Edited on 29/10/07 by blakep82]
________________________
IVA manual link http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?type=RESOURCES&itemId=1081997083
don't write OT on a new thread title, you're creating the topic, everything you write is very much ON topic!
|
|
|
Confused but excited.
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 04:25 PM |
|
|
If they didn't do it on/in a seven, who gives a sh1t?
Tell them about the bent treacle edges!
|
|
|
Grimsdale
|
| posted on 29/10/07 at 08:47 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Confused but excited.
If they didn't do it on/in a seven, who gives a sh1t?
Amen!!! that is very true!
|
|
|
Mag1caltrev0r
|
| posted on 30/10/07 at 08:35 PM |
|
|
A bit of a dodgy area here. The forum owners could get into trouble if they were to leave the name of the person on here.
it's fairly easily found with the power of Google
... I found it
|
|
|
iank
|
| posted on 30/10/07 at 09:31 PM |
|
|
Since it's been all over fox news he will apparently be making a public statement soon.
As for 'minor' royal he's certainly a known name.
--
Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Anonymous
|
|
|
jack trolley
|
| posted on 31/10/07 at 06:59 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
britishtrident
|
| posted on 31/10/07 at 07:29 PM |
|
|
They got one of the younger "rent a Kents" to take the blame. Word is somebody a great deal nearer Chucky , had to be or Buck house would
have been involved.
Other thing is heterosexual sex wouldn't raise many eyebrows the royal family have been having it off with the peasants for centuries.
My bet is Max Mosley is behind to divert attention from him.
Windsors should stick to shooting rare birds
[I] “ What use our work, Bennet, if we cannot care for those we love? .”
― From BBC TV/Amazon's Ripper Street.
[/I]
|
|
|
