Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Reply
Author: Subject: power to weight (how)
madteg

posted on 26/11/07 at 06:30 PM Reply With Quote
power to weight (how)

Does anyone know how to work out power to weight. thanks.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
indykid

posted on 26/11/07 at 06:36 PM Reply With Quote
quite simply.

you divide the power of your car by the weight:p

as for getting the figures, a weighbridge and a rolling road are about your best options.

have a look at some of the online calculators or data websites if you have a standard engine for the power output.

tom






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
keithice

posted on 26/11/07 at 06:49 PM Reply With Quote
Take the weight and find the number required to multiply to take it to a tonne.. then multiply the horsepower by the same amount...
example:- a car weighs 635 kgs with 221 bhp, so
1 tonne divided by 0.635 tonne = 1.574 approx.. so 221 bhp times 1.574 = 347.854 bhp per tonne...





Smile and wave boys.... Smile and wave....

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
snapper

posted on 26/11/07 at 06:49 PM Reply With Quote
Metric Tonne is 1000 Kg
Your car is 600 Kg
Your BHP is 150.
Divide 600 X 150 = 0.25 and multiply by 1000. = 250 BHP per Tonne





I eat to survive
I drink to forget
I breath to pi55 my ex wife off (and now my ex partner)

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
mat.price

posted on 26/11/07 at 09:12 PM Reply With Quote
the way i work it out is
metric tonne is 1000kg or 1
your car is 600kg or 0.600 of a tonne
your bhp is 150 per tonne
so 150 bhp divided by 0.600 should work out the output of the car
150 / 0.600 = 250 bhp per tonne

hope this help in some way

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Dale

posted on 27/11/07 at 01:12 AM Reply With Quote
Maybe its just me but in cars this light , the drivers weight should be included. But that is just me.
Dale





Thanks
Dale

my 14 and11 year old boys 22
and 19 now want to drive but have to be 25 before insurance will allow. Finally on the road

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 27/11/07 at 01:24 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dale
Maybe its just me but in cars this light , the drivers weight should be included. But that is just me.
Dale



In cars this light the driver's weight will certainly be a bigger influence than a heavier car with more powerful engine when comparing performance and power / weight ratio I agree.

For pub bragging rights though - got to really stick to a level playing field so no driver weight added.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
DarrenW

posted on 27/11/07 at 11:31 AM Reply With Quote
If you are trying to compare your cars spec to known production cars then just use the wet weight. ie full of fuel and fluids but no driver.

If you want to know the overall on road figure then use wet weight plus driver.

Most people use wet weight minus driver.






View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
alfasudsprint

posted on 27/11/07 at 11:33 AM Reply With Quote
I think many weights quoted are pretty much dry, only incl a few vital fluids.
Tim

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
wicket

posted on 27/11/07 at 12:32 PM Reply With Quote
SVA weight is all fluids, full tank, no driver or passenger.
View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
Hellfire

posted on 27/11/07 at 12:46 PM Reply With Quote
The standard SVA test does not give you a true vehicle weight (unless you specifically ask for it) It merely weighs individual axles.

Phil






View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
Paul TigerB6

posted on 27/11/07 at 01:24 PM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hellfire
The standard SVA test does not give you a true vehicle weight (unless you specifically ask for it) It merely weighs individual axles.

Phil



Any idea by how much the wet weight at SVA which weighs the axles individually for calculating brake efficiency would be different to the true wet weight??


Learn something new every day!!
Cheers
Paul

[Edited on 27/11/07 by Paul TigerB6]

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
jrevillug

posted on 27/11/07 at 09:53 PM Reply With Quote
surely adding the axle weights will give the wet weight?
View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
flak monkey

posted on 29/11/07 at 07:47 AM Reply With Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Hellfire
The standard SVA test does not give you a true vehicle weight (unless you specifically ask for it) It merely weighs individual axles.

Phil


Its not far out though. The only error comes from the car sitting at a stupid angle when in the rollers. If the rollers were at floor level so the car sat level then the sum of the two axle weights is the total weight of the car. Irrelevant of where the centre of gravity is in relation to the axles.

If you want a spot on weight, you need to take it to a weighbridge, but the sva weight is not far out at all.

David





Sera

http://www.motosera.com

View User's Profile Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.