Printable Version | Subscribe | Add to Favourites
New Topic New Poll New Reply
Author: Subject: Modified cortina upright geometry for CANAMSA
Fred W B

posted on 31/3/08 at 02:40 PM Reply With Quote
Modified cortina upright geometry for CANAMSA

On the mechanical side (for a change) I have started working out what machined bits I need to get made up to attach the top M16 rod end and the lower bearing to the cortina front uprights.

At the moment I have 225/60 tyres on 7” supalights with offset of 12P and back space of 112mm. This gives a large scrub radius with the standard cortina uprights.

If I move the lower joint outwards as shown in the photo I can get a KPI of 12 – 10 degrees, with a scrub radius of 18 to 38 mm respectively. I could do this by making up a bracket like this wooden mock up. I was thinking 12 mm steel for the lower offset plate, with a stepped lower stud tapped, screwed and then puddle welded to the plate on the back side.

The flat plate is bolted to the body of the upright through the existing M8 tapped holes in the upright, with spacers below welded to the plate. This plate maybe 6 mm, and the webs in 8 mm? The vertical load would be taken by the 12mm plate, with the webs providing fore and aft stability.

I want to be able to eventually upgrade to custom 8J rims, with offset such that the outer rim face sits in the same place as now. This would reduce the scrub radius by a further 12 mm.

I may eventually end up getting uprights cast, so consider this a development prototype.

Thoughts anybody?

Cheers

Fred W B


upright geo mock
upright geo mock



upright bracket 1
upright bracket 1



upright bracket 2
upright bracket 2


[Edited on 31/3/08 by Fred W B]

[Edited on 31/3/08 by Fred W B]





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member
JAG

posted on 31/3/08 at 03:07 PM Reply With Quote
I cannot comment on the geometry mods that you're proposing except to say that I have read that the standard Cortina geometry is not ideal.

However you're proposed method for modifiying the standard Cortina upright certainly looks solid enough. Obviously without any simulation software (ANSYS FEA etc...) you just have to rely on physical testing.

I think I would definitely make a pair for real and give it a go - keep us uptodate on your success as I can imagine quite a few people would be interested in making their own if they work - and you're happy with that of course

Edited to add that you could also incorporate the cycle wing bracket into them.

[Edited on 31/3/08 by JAG]





Justin


Who is this super hero? Sarge? ...No.
Rosemary, the telephone operator? ...No.
Penry, the mild-mannered janitor? ...Could be!

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Mr Whippy

posted on 31/3/08 at 03:26 PM Reply With Quote
my first reaction is, why are they so heavy? my indi's rear fabricated uprights were made from less than 3mm sheet. I've looked closely at fabricated uprights on a rather well made old formula car and the uprights although quite large, I discovered by tapping them, are in fact thin walled hollow boxes (expertly made) they must have weighed next to nothing but looked very strong.

[Edited on 31/3/08 by Mr Whippy]





Fame is when your old car is plastered all over the internet

View User's Profile E-Mail User Visit User's Homepage View All Posts By User U2U Member
MikeR

posted on 31/3/08 at 05:56 PM Reply With Quote
have you looked at the wilwood caliper?

I've no idea what its dimensions are, but it may be better / lighter (although more expensive).

good luck.

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
ecosse

posted on 31/3/08 at 06:43 PM Reply With Quote
Ingenious way to do it for sure
But while I'm not able to comment on the geometry, I get the feeling that you are not be far away from actually constructing a complete upright from scratch anyway i.e. fabricate another mount on the top and add a steering arm (okay I simplified that a touch ) and add a stub pin, which would be a lot lighter than fabricating around the tina parts, and would get you the exact geometry required?

Cheers
Alex

View User's Profile View All Posts By User U2U Member
Fred W B

posted on 1/4/08 at 03:35 PM Reply With Quote
Thanks for responses so far guys.

So where are all the resident experts? What with my proposal containing possibly wacky ideas relating to various "hot button" items such as:

welding up upright bits
rod end use as pivots
ackermann
front geometry

I was expecting more comment, considering how recent similar posts have been responded to

Cheers

Fred W B





You can do it quickly. You can do it cheap. You can do it right. – Pick any two.

View User's Profile E-Mail User View All Posts By User U2U Member

New Topic New Poll New Reply


go to top






Website design and SEO by Studio Montage

All content © 2001-16 LocostBuilders. Reproduction prohibited
Opinions expressed in public posts are those of the author and do not necessarily represent
the views of other users or any member of the LocostBuilders team.
Running XMB 1.8 Partagium [© 2002 XMB Group] on Apache under CentOS Linux
Founded, built and operated by ChrisW.