Carl.H
|
| posted on 23/9/03 at 03:14 PM |
|
|
I here thermite that's rust + aluminium powder and something hot to light it with (magnesium wire), works a treat.
Molten iron dose wonders for electrics.
If enough cameras are destroyed they'll start costing to much to keep replacing.
Problem solved 
|
|
|
|
|
Spyderman
|
| posted on 23/9/03 at 05:45 PM |
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by protofj
Easy - all vote conservative....
Yes believe it or not the conservative party is still going - operating out of a lock up in peckham i understand....
However they have a befinate vote winner in thier new manifesto - ban speed cameras!!
So I say lets all vote for IDS (doesn't that also stand for infant death syndrome?)
And screw the economy.......
Erm!
Wasn't it them that introduced the damn things in the first place under Thatcher?
Then the Tories Mark2 (New Labour) just up'd the numbers again!
If the Tories did get back in and did ban the cameras, they would just double the cost of petrol again to cover the loss.
It's a no-win scenario!
Spyderman
|
|
|
thekafer
|
| posted on 24/9/03 at 03:40 AM |
|
|
I know this is an old thread but just this morning I heard on the news that there is a new law in the U.S. concerning license obstructions, among them
was polorizing film placed in front of a plate.
I fear this is a prelude to new speed camera revenue generators in our land
"...another law to protect us...more lawyers to infect us...it's all about the money..it's all about the money...."(sum-41)
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal labotomy...
|
|
|
johnemms
|
| posted on 22/10/03 at 04:10 PM |
|
|
someone gave me the idea of putting a 12v Flash bulb in with the numberplate light, coupled with a sensor on the back of the car, it sensed the cam
flash causing the Flash bulb above the number plate to flash at the same time!!! This should overexpose the number plate on the film. However I
havnt tested it yet !!!
|
|
|
JoelP
|
| posted on 22/10/03 at 04:37 PM |
|
|
that does indeed work if set up right. i seen a few sample pictures somewhere. may be illegal though i cant remember specifically why.
|
|
|
Stu16v
|
| posted on 22/10/03 at 08:53 PM |
|
|
Trouble is, a lot of new Gasto's and other speed traps donr use flashes now.....
Dont just build it.....make it!
|
|
|
marshall
|
| posted on 4/11/03 at 07:01 AM |
|
|
sod a long rope and a land rover just get a jcb and ram it. or get joy riders to ramerm it gets rid of the gatso quicker.
|
|
|
Digger Barnes
|
| posted on 26/12/03 at 08:22 PM |
|
|
Has no-one heard of gatso can?
When I lived in middlesbrough the local youth would take a baked bean can, remove the label and attach it to a piece of string, then they would swing
it aroud their head in front of a speed camera.
The outcome being a complete roll of film being exposed on a bean can exceeding 30mph!
Not something I objected to though hehe
|
|
|
Graceland
|
| posted on 24/1/04 at 10:45 PM |
|
|
i've heard of that gatso can - think i'll go and try it and then use the contents of the can on the camera - beans flavoured camera, nice
!!!!
|
|
|
Jon Ison
|
| posted on 25/1/04 at 11:34 AM |
|
|
now that does apeal.......
just off to get sum string
|
|
|
fastavatar.jpg){kind=avatar}
